FTC Closes Investigation Into Google
The FTC has finally made an announcement regarding its investigation of Google for alleged anticompetitive conduct. The investigation is now closed.
Google has agreed to change some of the business practices to resolve the FTC’s concerns including those related to patents and what the FTC alls its “misuse of patent protection to prevent competition.”
“We stopped that abuse,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz at a press conference.
“The changes Google has agreed to make will ensure that consumers continue to reap the benefits of competition in the online marketplace and in the market for innovative wireless devices they enjoy,” said Leibowitz. “This was an incredibly thorough and careful investigation by the Commission, and the outcome is a strong and enforceable set of agreements.”
“We are especially glad to see that Google will live up to its commitments to license its standard-essential patents, which will ensure that companies willing to license these patents can compete in the market for wireless devices,” Leibowitz added. “This decision strengthens the standard-setting process that is at the heart of innovation in today’s technology markets.”
On search, Leibowitz said, “It doesn’t violate the American antitrust laws,” so the FTC has decided not to take action on search allegations, though Google had agreed to make a couple of adjustments.
“The evidence the FTC uncovered through this intensive investigation prompted us to require significant changes in Google’s business practices. However, regarding the specific allegations that the company biased its search results to hurt competition, the evidence collected to date did not justify legal action by the Commission,” said Beth Wilkinson, outside counsel to the Commission. “Undoubtedly, Google took aggressive actions to gain advantage over rival search providers. However, the FTC’s mission is to protect competition, and not individual competitors. The evidence did not demonstrate that Google’s actions in this area stifled competition in violation of U.S. law.”
Regarding search bias, the FTC says in a press release:
Google addressed the close of the investigation in a post on its Public Policy Blog, where Chief Legal Officer David Drummond writes, “Larry and Sergey founded Google because they believed that building a great search experience would improve people’s lives. And in the decade-plus that’s followed, Google has worked hard to make it quicker and easier for users to find what they need. In the early days you would type in a query, we’d return 10 blue links and you’d have to click on them individually to find what you wanted. Today we can save you the hassle by providing direct answers to your questions, as well as links to other sites. So if you type in [weather san francisco], or [tom hanks movies], we now give you the answer right from the results page—because truly great search is all about turning your needs into actions in the blink of an eye.”
Drummond wrote a letter (pdf) to the FTC making two specific product changes. In the post, he summarizes them: “Websites can already opt out of Google Search, and they can now remove content (for example reviews) from specialized search results pages, such as local, travel and shopping,” and, “Advertisers can already export their ad campaigns from Google AdWords. They will now be able to mix and copy ad campaign data within third-party services that use our AdWords API.”
“We’ve always accepted that with success comes regulatory scrutiny,” says Drummond. “But we’re pleased that the FTC and the other authorities that have looked at Google’s business practices—including the U.S. Department of Justice (in its ITA Software review), the U.S. courts (in the SearchKing and Kinderstart cases), and the Brazilian courts (in a case last year)—have concluded that we should be free to combine direct answers with web results. So we head into 2013 excited about our ability to innovate for the benefit of users everywhere.”
Leibowitz said Google will stop scraping content of its rivals for use in its own specialized search results, and has made “legally enforceable commitments” including reporting requirements that will allow it to be monitored.
The decision to close the search investigation was reached with a unanimous vote. Leibowitz does acknowledge that they can always reopen investigation if they think they need to.
He did acknowledge that “some evidence” suggested that Google was trying to eliminate competition, but changes to the algorithm that the FTC looked at were deemed to have “plausible connection with improving search results,” especially when competitors tried to “game” the algorithm.
He also noted that Google’s search engine rivals engage in “many of the same product design choices” Google does. While not everything google did was beneifcial, he said, “on balance,” the evidence did not supprot an FTC challenge to Google’s practices.
He went on to call Google “one of America’s great companies,” and mentioned the driverless cars and “augmented reality eyewear”.
Now, he said, Google can refocus on its business and products while understanding that it must compete fairly.
|Small Business News is brought to you by iEntry, Inc.|